| 
                
                
                
                 
                Daniel de 
				Vise, Washington Post, Monday, March 17, 2008 
                Victoria Miresso cannot button a shirt, match a sock or tell one 
				school bus from another. Yet at Roberto Clemente Middle School 
				in Germantown, she is expected to function much like any other 
				sixth-grader, coping with class changes, algebra quizzes and 
				lunchroom bullies.
 
                Victoria's parents say she is a victim of inclusion: a trend, in 
				Montgomery County and across the nation, toward shutting down 
				traditional special education classes and placing special-needs 
				students in regular classrooms at neighborhood schools.
 
                "At this point, we're about halfway through the school year, and 
				she hasn't learned anything," said Laura Johnson, her mother. 
				"It's not fair for her to go to school and sit there and be 
				teased because she doesn't understand what they're teaching 
				her."
 
                Montgomery school officials say Victoria is no victim. She is, 
				however, one of the first generation of students who cannot 
				attend secondary learning centers, a network of self-contained 
				classrooms open to special education students at eight middle 
				and high schools in the county since the 1970s. Montgomery 
				school leaders decided in 2006 to phase out the centers, part of 
				an ongoing shift of special-ed students and teachers out of 
				separate classrooms and into the general school population.
 
                It ranks among the most controversial decisions made by 
				Montgomery Superintendent Jerry D. Weast, who has run the 
				138,000-student system since 1999. A hundred parents picketed 
				the school board in the dead of winter to protest the closure. 
				They argued that the small, sheltered classes were the only 
				setting that worked for their children. Weast and the school 
				board maintained that students in the centers weren't learning 
				and deserved the same rigorous lessons offered to everyone else.
 
                The conflict illustrates a broader schism within the special 
				education community over inclusion, a national effort to break 
				down the walls that have separated special-needs students from 
				their peers. Some parents want their special-needs children 
				exposed to the brisk academics and complex social tapestry of a 
				suburban neighborhood school. Others, including the Johnsons, do 
				not.
 
                Victoria Miresso has an IQ of 55, according to diagnostic papers 
				her parents keep in a thick file at the family home. She is only 
				partially mainstreamed at Roberto Clemente, taking a mix of 
				mainstream and special-ed classes. Nonetheless, her mother said, 
				she is lost.
 
                "She doesn't understand a word," Laura Johnson said. "She writes 
				on her tests, 'I don't know,' and she has to hand it in."
 
                Students such as Victoria were routinely housed in separate 
				schools until 1975, when the federal Individuals With 
				Disabilities Education Act mandated that disabled and 
				non-disabled students be taught together "to the maximum extent 
				appropriate." A first wave of inclusion shifted special 
				education classrooms into neighborhood schools. A second wave, 
				starting in the late 1990s, moved many special education 
				students out of those classrooms and into large mainstream 
				classes, along with an army of special education teachers and 
				aides charged with helping them keep up.
 
                The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 pressed the issue further, 
				requiring school systems to demonstrate that special-ed students 
				attain academic proficiency at the same rate as their peers.
 
                Only 8 percent of learning center students in Montgomery middle 
				schools rated proficient last year on the Maryland School 
				Assessment in reading, and only 4 percent passed the statewide 
				math test. Students with comparable disabilities who attended 
				mainstream classes performed much better. Under No Child Left 
				Behind, all special-needs students tested are expected to pass 
				by 2014.
 
                School system leaders say the transition, grade by grade, away 
				from learning centers has been a resounding success. All 
				sixth-grade teachers and hundreds of aides responsible for 
				serving the students attended mandatory training over the 
				summer. Case managers were assigned to each of the 70 students 
				being mainstreamed, most of whom had attended elementary school 
				learning centers, which are not being closed. Each student has 
				been monitored over the year, and extra staff assigned as needed 
				to help them succeed. A parent survey, given this fall, found 
				just two parents dissatisfied with inclusion, although only 24 
				families responded.
 
                Ketia Ingram-Adams said her 12-year-old foster daughter has made 
				a smooth transition from an elementary learning center to 
				mainstream classes at Briggs Chaney Middle School in the 
				Spencerville area, where she is getting A's and B's.
 
                Ingram-Adams's daughter had no formal schooling until about age 
				7. School psychologists concluded she had attention-deficit 
				hyperactivity disorder, although her foster mother thinks that 
				the diagnosis might be wrong.
 
                Last year, the learning center setting -- 10 students and two 
				teachers, working at an easy pace -- helped the girl gain years 
				of missed reading and math instruction.
 
                "She would get tips on things that would help her learn more 
				math, do better at her reading, practice her writing, her 
				reading comprehension," the mother said. "And she would 
				sometimes get frustrated. But they taught her how to get back 
				the focus, to 'Slow down, close your eyes, count to 10.' "
 
                This year, she has moved effortlessly into the neighborhood 
				middle school.
 
                "She can read chapter books, she can do addition and 
				subtraction, multiplication and division," Ingram-Adams said. 
				"It's just like they gave her the push she needed in school."
 
                But other parents say inclusion has been a disaster, leaving 
				their children bewildered and friendless. They are particularly 
				resentful at being excluded from the decision-making process 
				that doomed the centers. Resentment lingers, even after Weast 
				altered the plan so that all of the roughly 600 students 
				attending the centers could stay through graduation.
 
                Michelle Ryan of Gaithersburg said she was open to the idea of 
				mainstreaming daughter Allyson, 12, who has autism. She wanted 
				Allyson to earn a diploma.
 
                But Allyson was not ready for Forest Oak Middle School. She had 
				a meltdown in the first week of school, "crying and screaming," 
				her mother said. She found her locker, and her classes, only 
				with help from an attentive aide who followed her around.
 
                Today, Allyson is getting B's and C's. But Ryan suspects 
				teachers might be inflating her daughter's grades to make the 
				transition look like a success. Worse, Allyson has begun to feel 
				inferior to her classmates, "and she never had that problem 
				before," her mother said. Isolated from other special-needs 
				students, she has no friends and eats lunch alone.
 
                "Yes, academically, it might be better for her to be 
				mainstreamed, and that was always my goal for her as a parent," 
				Ryan said. "But she wasn't ready."
 
                  
                
                back to the top     ~    
                back to Breaking News     
                ~     back to 
                What's New 
                  |