Participate in our Quick Poll: Child with an IEP Sent Home From School
 

Bridges4Kids Logo

 

What's New? | Early Childhood | Positive Behavior Support | Wrightslaw

Lead Poisoning | NCLB | LDA of Michigan| Family 2 Family Health Education & Info Center

Michigan Alliance for Families | The Arc Michigan | Yellow Pages for Kids

 

Home Page Contact Us About Us State & National Links Search Contact Your Legislators Book & Video Reviews Download/Order Publications Disabilities & Disorders IDEA Reauthorization Special Education SSI/Medicaid/Medicare/FSS Child Care & Respite Information Wraparound Services Insurance Information PAC Information General Ed Reform Literacy Community Schools Children At-Risk Section 504 School Climate & Bullying in Schools Cultural Issues Professional Development Parenting & Adoption Support/Information Home Schooling Community Living Health & Safety Summer Camp Kids & Teens College & Financial Aid Charter, Private & Alternative Schools Legal Research Recent Court Cases Juvenile Justice Advocacy Child Protective Services Statistics New Legislation Ask the Attorney Bridges4Kids Main Menu

 
 Where to find help for a child in Michigan, Anywhere in the U.S., or Canada
 
Last Updated: 11/05/2009
 
www

Bridges4Kids

Subscribe to the Bridges4Kids NewsDigest!                          Add Bridges4Kids to my favorites!

 

 Article of Interest - Medicaid

COURT: Medicaid Rules Wrong on parent/Non-Parent Benefits
from Gongwer News Service, January 27, 2003
For more articles visit www.bridges4kids.org

 
Michigan was wrong to require non-parental custodians of children to pay more to be eligible for Medicaid benefits than parents, the 6th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals ruled Monday.

The unanimous decision, in Markva v. Haveman (USCOA docket No. 01-2509), upheld a ruling from the U.S. District Court in Detroit that the rules violated federal statutes and regulations.

The decision enjoins the state from using a different methodology to calculate the eligibility of non-parental custodians of children for Medicaid health benefits than of parents.

"There is simply no basis in the relevant statute or regulations to distinguish among individuals in the 'medically needy' 'caretaker relative' group based on financial responsibility or any other such criteria," said Judge Martha Craig Daughtrey in the decision joined by Judges Karen Nelson Moore and Peter Economus.

A spokesperson for the Department of Community Health said department staff were just reviewing the ruling and had no comment on whether the state would appeal the decision.

The plaintiffs in the case are a group of grandparents raising their grandchildren because the parents are either dead or absent, and sued the state because rules instituted since the 1996 changes in welfare meant they would have to pay proportionally more to be eligible for Medicaid benefits for their grandchildren than would parents.

The courts said although there might be valid policy reasons for the state to differentiate between parents and non-parent custodians, which based its decision on the fact that parents are legally responsible for a child's financial needs, the policy does not meet federal requirements that caretakers for dependant children be treated substantially the same.

"Both parents and non-parents who care for dependent children are members of the 'caretaker relative' Medicaid eligibility group defined" by the law, the court ruled.
 

Thank you for visiting http://www.bridges4kids.org/.

 

bridges4kids does not necessarily agree with the content or subject matter of all articles nor do we endorse any specific argument.  Direct any comments on articles to deb@bridges4kids.org.  

 

 

© 2002-2009 Bridges4Kids - Report a Bad Link